Saskatchewan
2003-2008 Prairie Conservation Action Plan (PCAP)
Partner Update Number Six (#6)
June 1, 2003 to March 31, 2006

 
 

Partner Update #6 (597KB) is also available as a downloadable pdf document which may be saved and printed.

 
This PCAP Partner Update was compiled by
Karyn Scalise, Manager and The PCAP Partnership Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan (PCAP)
ph: (306) 352-0472, fax: (306) 569-8799, e-mail: pcap@sasktel.net


Introduction to the PCAP Partner Update #6

This Partner Update provides an opportunity for PCAP Partner groups to communicate their prairie conservation activities, and facilitates the identification of progress and shortfalls in the implementation of the 2003-2008 Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan (PCAP). Documenting progress is essential to keeping members of our Partnership and other interest groups current, involved and motivated on priorities and for communicating our accomplishments to funding agencies. In addition, these Updates facilitate an understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the various Partner groups active in the Prairie Ecozone and result in increased efficiencies through stimulating multi-Partner approaches on Actions of mutual concern. It is hoped that the information presented within this Update will stimulate continued discussion, participation, and a sense of involvement and urgency in meeting prairie conservation goals in Saskatchewan. PCAP needs to be foremost in the minds of people making decisions that affect the integrity of prairie ecosystems.

This Partner Update is the third and last in a series of annual Updates that correspond to the 78 Actions contained in our 2003-2008 (SK PCAP). Partner Updates # 1, 2 and 3 documented progress on our 1998-2003 Action Plan. Partner Updates #4 and #5 provided an inventory of Partner activities from the launch of the 2003-2008 PCAP, to March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively. Each series of Updates is cumulative, so this Update #6 includes and updates information that was presented in Updates #4 and #5 and highlights activities that occurred between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006 as well as activities that have not been reported on previously. A total of 25 of our 27 Partner groups contributed reports to this Update and representatives from 22 groups participated in the evaluation and ranking process. Two new Partners joined our Partnership in March 2006 and also included information on some of their activities.

Goal Working Groups met prior to the Partner Update Meeting that was held on March 30, 2006 to discuss, evaluate and rank progress on the Actions contained within their Goals. Goal Groups used the same ranking system that was used in Partner Update #5, as illustrated below:
1 - No Progress
2 - Some Progress
3 - Good Progress
4 - Excellent Progress
5 - Complete

This varies somewhat from the ranking system of Poor, Fair, or Good that we used when evaluating progress on Actions in Partner Update #4.

The Goal Inventory Tables list activities that were delivered by PCAP Partners, relative to each Action. Reports are listed in alphabetical order by Partner acronym. In cases where Partners are involved, we tried to list the lead Partner first. For ease, rankings assigned in Partner Updates # 4, 5 and 6 are presented alongside each Action. Acronyms of lead and support Partners are also listed alongside each Action. These are carried forward from the implementation tables in the 2003-2008 PCAP and illustrate the lead (in bold) and support Partners that originally committed to work on the Action. Partners that joined the Partnership in March 2006 also signed on to Actions they intended to contribute to and these acronyms are shown in italics. New and updated Partner reports appear in bold.

PCAP Operations

The PCAP Partnership has been chaired by the Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association (SSGA) since 1998. A full-time Manager, based out of the SSGA Office in Regina, is in place to guide Plan implementation. The position of a part-time assistant was expanded to full time in January 2006. Meetings of the Partnership are held at least three times annually to exchange information, discuss issues, evaluate progress and develop strategies related to Plan implementation. The PCAP uses a consensus-based approach to decision making. Goal Working Groups, which were established during Plan renewal process, remain active and continue to facilitate work on identifying progress and shortfalls related to each of our five Goals.
The following Committees were established in November 2003 and updated in March 2006:

  • Executive Committee: The Executive Committee is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the 2003-2008 PCAP. The PCAP Chair and Manager are ex-officio positions. Members include: Michael Burgess (SSGA- PCAP Chair), Karyn Scalise (PCAP - Manager), Chris Nykoluk (AAFC-PFRA), Mary Brick (SAF), Greg Riemer (SE), and Tom Harrison (SWA).
  • Proposal Review Committee: The Proposal Review Committee reviews proposals submitted to the PCAP Office for purposes of securing approval or letters of support. Proposals must be submitted two weeks before the support letter is required. Members include Karyn Scalise (PCAP), Shelley Heidinger (SP), Ann Riemer (SE), Michael Burgess (SSGA) and other Partner representatives, as determined by their expertise.
  • Science Committee: This Committee is responsible for science-based components related to each of PCAPs five Goals. The Science Committee Chair is Dr. Stephen Davis (EC-CWS) and members include: Greg Riemer and Ann Riemer (SE), Tom Harrison (SWA), Pat Fargey (PC-GNP), Dr. Alan Iwaasa (AAFC-SPARC), Bill Bristol (AAFC-PFRA), Tara Schmidt (DFO) and Dr. David Gauthier (UofR-CPRC).
  • Policy Committee: This Committee is responsible for addressing policy issues related to the following Objectives and Actions: I2b, II4a&b, II4c&d, II6, II7, II8a, and III4c. The Policy Committee Chair is Chuck Dechamps (DUC) and members include Garth Wruck (NPSS), Mary Brick and Don Fontaine (SAF), Greg Riemer (SE), Lesley Hall (SWA), Orin Balas (SSGA) and Lorne Scott (SWF).
  • 2007 Prairie Conservation and Endangered Species Conference (PCESC) Committee: This Conference is held every 3 years and rotates between cities in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. The 2007 PCESC will be held in Regina and the PCAP is organizing this major conference that is anticipated to attract over 500 delegates from several jurisdictions in the North American Great Plains. Co-Chairs are Allen Patkau (SSGA) and Dr. David Gauthier (UofR) Committee members include: Chris Nykoluk (AAFC-PFRA); Dr. Alan Iwaasa (AAFC-SPARC); Michael Champion (DUC); Dr. Stephen Davis (EC-CWS); Kim Dohms, Robert Warnock, and Michelle Yaskowich (NS); Jordan Ignatiuk and Kylie McRae (NCC); Pat Fargey and Robert Sissons (PC-GNP); Karyn Scalise and Lauren Burton (PCAP); Dr. Glenn Sutter (RSM); Ann Riemer (SE); Allen Patkau (SSGA); Sharon Metz, Jennifer Lohmeyer, and Tom Harrison (SWA); and Dr. Joe Schmutz (UofS). A total of 6 PCESC planning meetings were held between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. This supports Goal V, Objective 3, Action b.

PCAP Progress – Executive Summary

This Partner Update reports on the activities of PCAP Partner Groups. Representatives from 20 Partner Groups participated in our March 2006 Plan Evaluation Meeting and reached consensus on ranking progress on our 78 Actions. In addition to tracking progress and shortfalls, this annual review serves to keep Partners informed and motivated and provides an invaluable forum for discussing issues affecting native prairie and strategies to address them.

PCAP Progress in addition to Activities listed in Table 1 and Highlights
The following is a list of accomplishments since April 1, 2005.

  • Proclamation of Native Prairie Appreciation Week 2005 (June 20-26) by the Minister of SAF, Mark Wartman. Joint press release with quotes from SAF and SE Ministers. SAF Minister Wartman announced NPAW and introduced a delegation of PCAP representatives in the Legislature.
  • 3 meetings of the PCAP Partnership have been held.
  • 6 meetings of the PCESC Planning Committee have been held.
  • Secured funding from 11 Partners, and 3 granting agencies in addition to receiving significant in-kind support from several Partner groups.
  • Completed PCAP Partner Update Number Six, herein, which provides an inventory of Partner activities relative to our 78 Actions, and ranks progress on them.
  • Recruited 2 new PCAP Partners; First Nations Agricultural Council of Saskatchewan (FNACS) and Prairie Learning Centre (PLC).

Table 1: Ranking of progress on PCAPs 78 Actions in the 2003-2008 Action Plan

Action Goal/Objective/Action Ranking
 

GOAL 1:  TO SUSTAIN A HEALTHY NATIVE PRAIRIE GRAZING RESOURCE

 

 

Objective 1 - Promote grazing management programs that are based on economically and scientifically sound principles

 

I 1 a

Continue extension programming with landowners

4

I 1 b

Host workshops, field days, range schools and other extension events

4

I 1 c

Produce and distribute extension materials for land managers

3

I 1 d

Provide ongoing training and resources for extension staff

4

I 1 e

Update and publish the “Range Plan Development Guide”

3

 

Objective 2 - Explore the economics of maintaining a healthy range resource for grazing

 

I 2 a

Encourage development of conservation cover programs that contribute to the ecological and socio-economic sustainability of rangelands

3

I 2 b

Develop an incentive-based lease rate structure program to encourage enhanced management on Crown leases

1

 

Objective 3 - Recognize and support the efforts of private and public land managers and industry that conserve native prairie

 

I 3 a

Increase support, awareness and publicity for both the SSGA/Royal Bank TESAward and the SRM Outstanding Achievement Award

4

I 3 b

Acknowledge the efforts of Award winners through development of a comprehensive communication plan (print media, advertising, presentations etc.)

3

 

Objective 4 - Increase the inventory of range resources on public and private lands to promote guidance on grazing management plans

 

 4 a

Complete range assessments and management plans for remaining pastures plus assessments on Crown leases

4

I 4 b

Promote range health assessment and management plan development on private lands (e.g. range schools

3

I 4 c

Promote range health assessment and management plan development on lands owned and managed by each respective agency or organization

3

I 4 d

Compile a “state of the resource” report, compiling all available public and private inventory data and analysis

1

 

GOAL 2:  TO CONSERVE THE REMAINING PRAIRIE RESOURCE

 

 

Objective 1 - Complete and maintain an inventory of native prairie

 

II 1 a

Acquire and interpret the most recent land cover and soils maps for southern Saskatchewan (update 2001 NPSS/UofS-CPRC publication

2

II 1 b

Identify areas of high risk for drainage or destruction

2

II 1 c

Coordinate the development of land information databases as tools for landowner negotiation, extension and technology transfer

3

 

Objective 2 - Continue to develop a system of managed conservation areas

 

II 2 a

Work towards completion of the RAN in the Prairie Ecozone

3

II 2 b

Identify and ensure that areas that are a priority for conservation receive protection

3

 

Objective 3 - Encourage voluntary stewardship to conserve native prairie

 

II 3 a

Support private stewardship programs that involve landowner extension work

3

II 3 b

Develop a landowner stewardship program directory

5

 

Objective 4 - Ensure that the remaining native prairie is protected from cultivation and development

 

II 4 a

Maintain the Crown’s commitment to conserving native prairie under its control; excluding prior commitments and promises made

4

II 4 b

Review all Crown land proposed sales involving native prairie and register CE’s where appropriate

3

II 4 c

In all circumstances, if WHPA land is sold a CE should be placed on the property to ensure that the natural values of the land receive the same level of protection as provided under WHPA

1

II 4 d

Acknowledge that under certain conditions there are options to make a CE agreement for a designated length of time rather than in perpetuity

5

 

Objective 5 - Improve the use of Conservation Easements (CEs) and other tools to conserve native prairie that accommodate and respect agricultural interests

 

II 5 a

Promote the use of CE’s to maintain native prairie on private lands

3

II 5 b

Do a gap analysis for non-purchase securement tools

2

II 5 c

Determine the types and levels of incentives required for native prairie conservation

2

II 5 d

Improve and simplify the process, agreements and valuation procedures for CE’s

1

II 5 e

Develop protocols, monitor and police CE’s

3

II 5 f

Determine the effect of CE’s on land values

3

II 5 g

Develop a forum for landowners to discuss pros and cons of CE's and other conservation tools

1

 

Objective 6 - Ensure that property taxation and assessment policies are favorable to native prairie conservation

 

II 6 a

Determine the impact of existing tax assessment policies and land use ratings on conservation of native prairie. Change policies that encourage “development” of land or place an unrealistic value on native prairie

3

II 6 b

Develop “conservation land” category with SAMA which better recognizes the public values provided

1

 

Objective 7 - Adopt and improve regulations, policies, programs, and economic instruments that reward rather than penalize stewardship and conservation of native prairie ecosystems

 

II 7 a

Identify and prioritize those regulations, policies, programs and economic instruments that are most significant

2

II 7 b

Promote adherence to federal and provincial wetland policies

2

II 7 c

Work to change regulations that are in conflict with stated government policies

3

II 7 d

Develop watershed conservation and/or restoration plans and improve watershed management

3

 

Objective 8 - Encourage government and industry to improve regulations, monitoring and technology to minimize negative impacts upon native prairie

 

II 8 a

Encourage industry to adopt the least invasive technologies when working on native prairie

3

II 8 b

Develop and deliver industry-specific conservation and stewardship education programs

3

II 8 c

Encourage government and industry to develop cumulative impacts guidelines

3

 

GOAL 3: TO MAINTAIN NATIVE PRAIRIE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

 

 

Objective 1 – Improve our understanding of native prairie biological diversity

 

III 1 a

Encourage studies and research on native prairie ecosystems with emphasis on the effects of different land management practices on key components of native biodiversity

3

III 1 b

Develop prairie ecosystem management decision support computer model that includes representative components of native biodiversity as one of the model outputs

3

 

Objective 2 - Promote management of native prairie to maintain biological diversity

 

III 2 a

Develop and incorporate biodiversity best management practice recommendations in range extension communication products

3

III 2 b

Encourage information exchange between range managers, biologists and others

4

 

Objective 3 - Control the threat and impact of introduced invasive species to native prairie

 

III 3 a

Identify and promote awareness of the negative impacts of introduced and invasive species to native prairie

2

III 3 b

Investigate and promote methods to manage and control invasive species

2

III 3 c

Discourage the introduction of additional non-native species that threaten native prairie biodiversity (e.g. development of protective buffer areas around significant native prairie areas by seeding non-invasive pasture species

3

 

Objective 4 - Promote restoration and recovery of native prairie ecosystems

 

III 4 a

Promote practical research to refine and increase use of restoration technology including the evaluation of the agricultural potential of using native species in forage production and grazing systems

4

III 4 b

Encourage the development and use of native seed mixes in permanent cover, reclamation programs and projects

3

III 4 c

Promote communication of Species at Risk legislation to stakeholders and actively encourage that implementation of the legislation be guided by the principal of working cooperatively with land managers

3

III 4 d

Identify restoration and recovery targets of high conservation value, assess the feasibility of restoration and recovery of those targets, and develop restoration strategies for suitable target sites

3

 

GOAL 4: TO PROMOTE COMPLEMENTARY SUSTAINABLE USES OF NATIVE PRAIRIE

 

 

Objective 1 – Promote community based business opportunities associated with native prairie

 

IV 1 a

Provide the tourism industry and community organizations with information and technical experience to support hunting, fishing, eco- and agri-tourism and other recreational activities

2

IV 1 b

Liaise with rural revitalization groups to develop guidelines to ensure sustainable use of native prairie

1

 

Objective 2 – Encourage the development of a native plant production industry

 

IV 2 a

Develop a native plant materials centre for research and development

2

IV 2 b

Develop educational materials and guidelines to promote the use and production of non-invasive native plant materials for re-vegetation in and adjacent to native areas

3

IV 2 c

Encourage the establishment of new, mandatory testing and certification programs for native, forage, and horticultural species, varieties, cultivars and ecological varieties at the Federal and Provincial levels

2

IV 2 d

Promote the development of local native seed growers, processors, suppliers and testing facilities

2

 

Objective 3 – Advance the exploration of native prairie towards the sustainable development of other bio-based products

 

IV 3 a

Develop exploration and research and development tax credits or other incentives for companies exploring and developing new bio-based products

1

IV 3 b

Develop guidelines, management plans, and licensing for the harvest of native prairie species

1

 

Objective 4 Recognize and quantify the socio-economic contribution of native prairie and perennial grasslands

 

IV 4 a

Survey the literature and conduct gap analysis regarding ecological services including grazing, and communicate the findings

3

IV 4 b

Encourage organizations to quantify and report on the economic and social benefits associated with their particular use of the native prairie resources economic and social benefits

2

 

GOAL 5: TO INCREASE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF NATIVE PRAIRIE AND ITS VALUES

 

 

Objective 1 – Promote awareness of the PCAP Vision, Goals, Objectives and Actions

 

V 1 a

Increase co-ordination and communication between agencies conducting research on native prairie ecosystems and feature a presentation relating to a particular Goal at each PCAP meeting

3

V 1 b

Maintain and regularly update the PCAP website

3

V 1 c

Link PCAP Partners to (and from) PCAP Website

3

V 1 d

Recruit new PCAP Partners

4

V 1 e

Promote the PCAP through the media

3

V 1 f

Compile and distribute annual Partner Updates

3

V 1 g

Promote the PCAP at trade-shows, conferences etc

2

V 1 h

Encourage Partners to regularly update staff and members

2

V 1 i

Provide newsletter articles to PCAP Partners and post them on websites

2

 

Objective 2 - Evaluate public awareness, appreciation and understanding of native prairie

 

V 2 a

Conduct and report on a questionnaire survey assessing public awareness, understanding and appreciation of native prairie

1

 

Objective 3 - Coordinate PCAP communication and education activities with other native prairie conservation initiatives

 

V 3 a

Contribute to the development of the CEC North American Grassland Conservation Strategy

3

V 3 b

Exchange information on a regular basis with other Prairie Conservation groups

3

 

Objective 4 - Educate the general public about native prairie ecosystems

 

V 4 a

Develop and deliver youth education programs

4

V 4 b

Develop and distribute educational materials