This Partner Update provides an opportunity for PCAP Partner groups to communicate their prairie conservation activities, and facilitates the identification of progress and shortfalls in the implementation of the 2003-2008 Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan (PCAP). Documenting progress is essential to keeping members of our Partnership and other interest groups current, involved and motivated on priorities and for communicating our accomplishments to funding agencies. In addition, these Updates facilitate an understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the various Partner groups active in the Prairie Ecozone and result in increased efficiencies through stimulating multi-Partner approaches on Actions of mutual concern. It is hoped that the information presented within this Update will stimulate continued discussion, participation, and a sense of involvement and urgency in meeting prairie conservation goals in Saskatchewan. PCAP needs to be foremost in the minds of people making decisions that affect the integrity of prairie ecosystems.
This Partner Update is the third and last in a series of annual Updates that correspond to the 78 Actions contained in our 2003-2008 (SK PCAP). Partner Updates # 1, 2 and 3 documented progress on our 1998-2003 Action Plan. Partner Updates #4 and #5 provided an inventory of Partner activities from the launch of the 2003-2008 PCAP, to March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively. Each series of Updates is cumulative, so this Update #6 includes and updates information that was presented in Updates #4 and #5 and highlights activities that occurred between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006 as well as activities that have not been reported on previously. A total of 25 of our 27 Partner groups contributed reports to this Update and representatives from 22 groups participated in the evaluation and ranking process. Two new Partners joined our Partnership in March 2006 and also included information on some of their activities.
Goal Working Groups met prior to the Partner Update Meeting that was held on March 30, 2006 to discuss, evaluate and rank progress on the Actions contained within their Goals. Goal Groups used the same ranking system that was used in Partner Update #5, as illustrated below:
1 - No Progress
2 - Some Progress
3 - Good Progress
4 - Excellent Progress
5 - Complete
This varies somewhat from the ranking system of Poor, Fair, or Good that we used when evaluating progress on Actions in Partner Update #4.
The Goal Inventory Tables list activities that were delivered by PCAP Partners, relative to each Action. Reports are listed in alphabetical order by Partner acronym. In cases where Partners are involved, we tried to list the lead Partner first. For ease, rankings assigned in Partner Updates # 4, 5 and 6 are presented alongside each Action. Acronyms of lead and support Partners are also listed alongside each Action. These are carried forward from the implementation tables in the 2003-2008 PCAP and illustrate the lead (in bold) and support Partners that originally committed to work on the Action. Partners that joined the Partnership in March 2006 also signed on to Actions they intended to contribute to and these acronyms are shown in italics. New and updated Partner reports appear in bold.
The PCAP Partnership has been chaired by the Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association (SSGA) since 1998. A full-time Manager, based out of the SSGA Office in Regina, is in place to guide Plan implementation. The position of a part-time assistant was expanded to full time in January 2006. Meetings of the Partnership are held at least three times annually to exchange information, discuss issues, evaluate progress and develop strategies related to Plan implementation. The PCAP uses a consensus-based approach to decision making. Goal Working Groups, which were established during Plan renewal process, remain active and continue to facilitate work on identifying progress and shortfalls related to each of our five Goals.
The following Committees were established in November 2003 and updated in March 2006:
Table 1: Ranking of progress on PCAPs 78 Actions in the 2003-2008 Action Plan
|
Action
|
Goal/Objective/Action
|
Ranking
|
|
|
GOAL
1: TO
SUSTAIN A HEALTHY NATIVE PRAIRIE GRAZING RESOURCE
|
|
|
|
Objective
1 - Promote grazing management
programs that are based on economically and scientifically sound
principles
|
|
|
I 1 a
|
Continue extension programming
with landowners
|
4
|
|
I 1 b
|
Host workshops, field days, range
schools and other extension events
|
4
|
|
I 1 c
|
Produce and distribute extension
materials for land managers
|
3
|
|
I 1 d
|
Provide ongoing training and
resources for extension staff
|
4
|
|
I 1 e
|
Update and publish the “Range
Plan Development Guide”
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
2 - Explore the economics of
maintaining a healthy range resource for grazing
|
|
|
I 2 a
|
Encourage development of
conservation cover programs that contribute to the ecological and
socio-economic sustainability of rangelands
|
3
|
|
I 2 b
|
Develop an incentive-based lease
rate structure program to encourage enhanced management on Crown leases
|
1
|
|
|
Objective
3 - Recognize and support the
efforts of private and public land managers and industry that conserve
native prairie
|
|
|
I 3 a
|
Increase support, awareness and
publicity for both the SSGA/Royal Bank TESAward and the SRM Outstanding
Achievement Award
|
4
|
|
I 3 b
|
Acknowledge the efforts of Award
winners through development of a comprehensive communication plan (print
media, advertising, presentations etc.)
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
4 - Increase the inventory of
range resources on public and private lands to promote guidance on grazing
management plans
|
|
|
4
a
|
Complete range assessments and
management plans for remaining pastures plus assessments on Crown leases
|
4
|
|
I 4 b
|
Promote range health assessment
and management plan development on private lands (e.g. range schools
|
3
|
|
I 4 c
|
Promote range health assessment
and management plan development on lands owned and managed by each
respective agency or organization
|
3
|
|
I 4 d
|
Compile a
“state of the resource” report, compiling all available public and
private inventory data and analysis
|
1
|
|
|
GOAL
2: TO CONSERVE THE REMAINING
PRAIRIE RESOURCE
|
|
|
|
Objective
1 - Complete and maintain an inventory of native prairie
|
|
|
II 1 a
|
Acquire and interpret the most
recent land cover and soils maps for southern Saskatchewan (update 2001
NPSS/UofS-CPRC publication
|
2
|
|
II 1 b
|
Identify areas of high risk for
drainage or destruction
|
2
|
|
II 1 c
|
Coordinate the development of land
information databases as tools for landowner negotiation, extension and
technology transfer
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
2 - Continue to develop a system
of managed conservation areas
|
|
|
II 2 a
|
Work towards completion of the RAN
in the Prairie Ecozone
|
3
|
|
II 2 b
|
Identify and ensure that areas
that are a priority for conservation receive protection
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
3 - Encourage voluntary
stewardship to conserve native prairie
|
|
|
II 3 a
|
Support private stewardship
programs that involve landowner extension work
|
3
|
|
II 3 b
|
Develop a landowner stewardship
program directory
|
5
|
|
|
Objective
4 - Ensure that the remaining
native prairie is protected from cultivation and development
|
|
|
II 4 a
|
Maintain the Crown’s commitment
to conserving native prairie under its control; excluding prior
commitments and promises made
|
4
|
|
II 4 b
|
Review all
Crown land proposed sales involving native prairie and register CE’s
where appropriate
|
3
|
|
II 4 c
|
In all circumstances, if WHPA land
is sold a CE should be placed on the property to ensure that the natural
values of the land receive the same level of protection as provided under
WHPA
|
1
|
|
II 4 d
|
Acknowledge that under certain
conditions there are options to make a CE agreement for a designated
length of time rather than in perpetuity
|
5
|
|
|
Objective
5 - Improve the use of
Conservation Easements (CEs) and other tools to conserve native prairie
that accommodate and respect agricultural interests
|
|
|
II 5 a
|
Promote the use of CE’s to
maintain native prairie on private lands
|
3
|
|
II 5 b
|
Do a gap analysis for non-purchase
securement tools
|
2
|
|
II 5 c
|
Determine the types and levels of
incentives required for native prairie conservation
|
2
|
|
II 5 d
|
Improve and simplify the process,
agreements and valuation procedures for CE’s
|
1
|
|
II 5 e
|
Develop protocols, monitor and
police CE’s
|
3
|
|
II 5 f
|
Determine the effect of CE’s on
land values
|
3
|
|
II 5 g
|
Develop a forum for landowners to
discuss pros and cons of CE's and other conservation tools
|
1
|
|
|
Objective
6 - Ensure that property
taxation and assessment policies are favorable to native prairie
conservation
|
|
|
II 6 a
|
Determine the impact of existing
tax assessment policies and land use ratings on conservation of native
prairie. Change policies that encourage “development” of land or place
an unrealistic value on native prairie
|
3
|
|
II 6 b
|
Develop “conservation land”
category with SAMA which better recognizes the
public values provided
|
1
|
|
|
Objective
7 - Adopt and improve
regulations, policies, programs, and economic instruments that reward
rather than penalize stewardship and conservation of native prairie
ecosystems
|
|
|
II 7 a
|
Identify and prioritize those
regulations, policies, programs and economic instruments that are most
significant
|
2
|
|
II 7 b
|
Promote adherence to federal and
provincial wetland policies
|
2
|
|
II 7 c
|
Work to change regulations that
are in conflict with stated government policies
|
3
|
|
II 7 d
|
Develop watershed conservation
and/or restoration plans and improve watershed management
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
8 - Encourage government and
industry to improve regulations, monitoring and technology to minimize
negative impacts upon native prairie
|
|
|
II 8 a
|
Encourage industry to adopt the
least invasive technologies when working on native prairie
|
3
|
|
II 8 b
|
Develop and deliver
industry-specific conservation and stewardship education programs
|
3
|
|
II 8 c
|
Encourage government and industry
to develop cumulative impacts guidelines
|
3
|
|
|
GOAL
3: TO MAINTAIN NATIVE PRAIRIE
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
|
|
|
|
Objective
1 – Improve our understanding
of native prairie biological diversity
|
|
|
III 1 a
|
Encourage
studies and research on native prairie ecosystems with emphasis on the
effects of different land management practices on key components of native
biodiversity
|
3
|
|
III 1 b
|
Develop
prairie ecosystem management decision support computer model that includes
representative components of native biodiversity as one of the model
outputs
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
2 - Promote management of native prairie to
maintain biological diversity
|
|
|
III 2 a
|
Develop and
incorporate biodiversity best management practice recommendations in range
extension communication products
|
3
|
|
III 2 b
|
Encourage
information exchange between range managers, biologists and others
|
4
|
|
|
Objective
3 - Control the threat and impact of introduced
invasive species to native prairie
|
|
|
III 3 a
|
Identify and
promote awareness of the negative impacts of introduced and invasive
species to native prairie
|
2
|
|
III 3 b
|
Investigate
and promote methods to manage and control invasive species
|
2
|
|
III 3 c
|
Discourage the
introduction of additional non-native species that threaten native prairie
biodiversity (e.g. development of protective buffer areas around
significant native prairie areas by seeding non-invasive pasture species
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
4 - Promote restoration and
recovery of native prairie ecosystems
|
|
|
III 4 a
|
Promote
practical research to refine and increase use of restoration technology
including the evaluation of the agricultural potential of using native
species in forage production and grazing systems
|
4
|
|
III 4 b
|
Encourage the
development and use of native seed mixes in permanent cover, reclamation
programs and projects
|
3
|
|
III 4 c
|
Promote
communication of Species at Risk legislation to stakeholders and actively
encourage that implementation of the legislation be guided by the
principal of working cooperatively with land managers
|
3
|
|
III 4 d
|
Identify
restoration and recovery targets of high conservation value, assess the
feasibility of restoration and recovery of those targets, and develop
restoration strategies for suitable target sites
|
3
|
|
|
GOAL
4: TO PROMOTE COMPLEMENTARY SUSTAINABLE USES OF NATIVE PRAIRIE
|
|
|
|
Objective
1 – Promote community based business opportunities associated with
native prairie
|
|
|
IV 1 a
|
Provide the tourism industry and
community organizations with information and technical experience to
support hunting, fishing, eco- and agri-tourism and other recreational
activities
|
2
|
|
IV 1 b
|
Liaise with rural revitalization
groups to develop guidelines to ensure sustainable use of native prairie
|
1
|
|
|
Objective
2 – Encourage the development of a native plant production industry
|
|
|
IV 2 a
|
Develop a native plant materials
centre for research and development
|
2
|
|
IV 2 b
|
Develop educational materials and
guidelines to promote the use and production of non-invasive native plant
materials for re-vegetation in and adjacent to native areas
|
3
|
|
IV 2 c
|
Encourage the establishment of
new, mandatory testing and certification programs for native, forage, and
horticultural species, varieties, cultivars and ecological varieties at
the Federal and Provincial levels
|
2
|
|
IV 2 d
|
Promote the development of local
native seed growers, processors, suppliers and testing facilities
|
2
|
|
|
Objective
3 – Advance the exploration of native prairie towards the sustainable
development of other bio-based products
|
|
|
IV 3 a
|
Develop exploration and research
and development tax credits or other incentives for companies exploring
and developing new bio-based products
|
1
|
|
IV 3 b
|
Develop guidelines, management
plans, and licensing for the harvest of native prairie species
|
1
|
|
|
Objective
4 – Recognize
and quantify the socio-economic contribution of native prairie and
perennial grasslands
|
|
|
IV 4 a
|
Survey the literature and conduct
gap analysis regarding ecological services including grazing, and
communicate the findings
|
3
|
|
IV 4 b
|
Encourage organizations to
quantify and report on the economic and social benefits associated with
their particular use of the native prairie resources economic and social
benefits
|
2
|
|
|
GOAL
5: TO INCREASE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF NATIVE PRAIRIE AND ITS
VALUES
|
|
|
|
Objective
1 – Promote awareness of the PCAP Vision, Goals, Objectives and Actions
|
|
|
V 1 a
|
Increase co-ordination and
communication between agencies conducting research on native prairie
ecosystems and feature a presentation relating to a particular Goal at
each PCAP meeting
|
3
|
|
V 1 b
|
Maintain and regularly update the
PCAP website
|
3
|
|
V 1 c
|
Link PCAP Partners to (and from)
PCAP Website
|
3
|
|
V 1 d
|
Recruit new PCAP Partners
|
4
|
|
V 1 e
|
Promote the PCAP through the media
|
3
|
|
V 1 f
|
Compile and distribute annual
Partner Updates
|
3
|
|
V 1 g
|
Promote the PCAP at trade-shows,
conferences etc
|
2
|
|
V 1 h
|
Encourage Partners to regularly
update staff and members
|
2
|
|
V 1 i
|
Provide newsletter articles to
PCAP Partners and post them on websites
|
2
|
|
|
Objective
2 - Evaluate public awareness, appreciation and understanding of native
prairie
|
|
|
V 2 a
|
Conduct and report on a
questionnaire survey assessing public awareness, understanding and
appreciation of native prairie
|
1
|
|
|
Objective
3 - Coordinate PCAP communication and education activities with other
native prairie conservation initiatives
|
|
|
V 3 a
|
Contribute to the development of
the CEC North American Grassland Conservation Strategy
|
3
|
|
V 3 b
|
Exchange information on a regular
basis with other Prairie Conservation groups
|
3
|
|
|
Objective
4 - Educate the general public about native prairie ecosystems
|
|
|
V 4 a
|
Develop and deliver youth
education programs
|
4
|
|
V 4 b
|
Develop and distribute educational
materials
|
|